The second day of the ACSR conference

On the second day of the conference participants had an opportunity to present their individual projects to the LCSS management.

On the second day of the conference participants had an opportunity to present their individual projects to the LCSS management.

The presentation took place in the format of open discussion that allows to evaluate and discuss the highs and lows of every report. 

Ronald Inglehart, LCSS scientific adviser, took part in the discussion, listened to the speeches with a great interest and gave his comments and recommendations. All our foreign guests who attended the conference also had a chance to get acquainted themselves with the intentions and aspirations of young Russian scientists.

All this has enabled young scientists invited from different cities of Russia and the CIS to get a unique experience and reach a new level of analysis of their projects. The participants got the idea of what tasks within the project they could implement.

Due to the fact that the conference attracted a great interest, it was decided to split statements of the participants into two days.
Below is a list of participants with a description of the subjects of their reports.

 

	Marharyta Fabrikant	Belarusian State University	Patterns of Nationalism in Post-Soviet States
	Svitlana Khutka	Kyiv National University	Gender differences in Subjective Well-Being and Human Agency in TransitionCountries
	Sviatlana Kroitar	Institute of sociology of the NAS, Belarus	Changes in the Determinants of Happiness in CIS Countries Compared to EUCountries
	Ekaterina Mitrofanova	HSE, Moscow	Changes in Fertility and Matrimony across Generations in the Post-Communist World
	Elena Prutskova	St.Tikhon’s Orthodox University	Profiling the Core and Periphery of Christian Orthodoxy
	Dimitri Rogozin	HSE, Moscow	Does Religiosity Affect People’s Values Differently in Different Denominations? TheCase of Orthodox Christianity
	Maksim Rudnev	ISRAS, HSE, Moscow	Testing the Predictive Power of the Inglehart and Schwartz Value Concepts
	Vladimir Magun	ISRAS, HSE, Moscow	Cross-National Cluster Distributions in Traditional/Secular-Rational Values andSurvival/Self-Expression Values
	Elizaveta Veikher	St.Petersburg State University	The Impact of Values on Policy Preferences in Sustainability Questions: EnvironmentalProtection, Conflict Prevention, and Global Solidarity
	Andrej Scherback	HSE, SPb	Tolerance of Homosexuality as a Predictor of Innovative Economic Behavior
	Anna Almakaeva	Samara State University	Solidarity, Trust Circles, and Social Milieus
	Svitlana Babenko	Kyiv National University	The Development of Inequality and its Effect on Human Agency in TransitionSocieties
	Alexander Stepanov	HSE, Moscow	Classifying and Explaining Age-Patterns in Life Satisfaction
	Tatjana Karabchuk	HSE, Moscow	Career-Fertility Combinations among Women and their Effect on Life Satisfaction
	Olena Muradyan	Kharkiv National University	The Effect of Individualization on Achievement Strategies across Cultures
	Anna Nemirovskaya	Siberian Federal University	Social Tolerance under Harsh Conditions
	Daria Oreshina	HSE, Moscow	Is Orthodox Christianity an Oriental Religion: A Comparison of the Value Profiles ofOrthodox Christians with Protestants, Catholics, and Muslims
	Alexei Zakharov	HSE, Moscow	Values and their Effect on Policy Positions in the Old-Left-Right/New-Left-RightConflict Space
	Evgeny Varshaver	HSE, Moscow	The Effect of Values on Ethnic Cleavages
	Kirill Zhirkov	HSE, SPb	Dissatisfaction, Anti-Americanism and Antimodernization in Developing Countries: a Comparative Study
	Olena Bogdanova	Kyiv Mohyla Academy	Capturing “Amoral Familism” with Ingroup/Outgroup Trust Patterns